УДК 330.101 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2019(103)06 | |
ЛЕБЕДЕВА Лариса, E-mail: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її. ORCID: 0000-0001-8632-5460 |
к. э. н, доцент, доцент кафедры экономической теории и конкурентной политики, Киевский национальный торгово-экономический университет ул. Киото, 19, г. Киев, 02156, Украина |
ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ТЕОРИЯ В ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯХ XXI В.
Проанализирована эволюция предмета исследования экономической теории на основе исторического метода, предложен предмет исследования экономической теории современности. Констатирован кризис экономической теории и неоклассической парадигмы экономических исследований, определены причины такого кризиса. Выделены отличия современной экономики знаний от экономики индустриального общества. Проанализированы и систематизированы современные исследования отечественных и зарубежных экономистов по изменениям в экономике XXI в. и их отражении в экономической науке.
Ключевые слова: парадигма экономической науки, предмет экономической теории, экономика окружающей среды, поведенческая экономика, институциональная экономика, эволюционная экономика, экономика знаний.
REFERENCES
- Bazylevych, V. (2016). Ekonomichna nauka ta osvita v epohu systemnyh transformacij: novi vyklyky i zapyty do fundamental'noi' teorii' [Economic science and education in the era of systemic transformations: new challenges and requests to fundamental theory]. Ekonomika Ukrai'ny – Ukraine economy, 8. 78-93 [in Ukrainian].
- Gejec', V. (2015). Polityko-ekonomichni zasady doslidzhennja suchasnogo suspil'stva [Political and economic principles of research of modern society]. Ekonomichna teorija – Economic theory, 3, 5-13 [in Ukrainian].
- Grycenko, A. (2015). Politychna ekonomija rozdileno-spil'nogo svitu: istorija i suchasnist' [Political economy of a divided, common world: history and modernity]. Ekonomichna teorija – Economic theory, 3, 14-29 [in Ukrainian].
- Zajcev, Ju., & Moskalenko, M. (2018). Politychna ekonomija globalizovanogo suspil'stva [Political economy of a globalized society]. Problemy ekonomiky ta politychnoi' ekonomii' – Problems of economy and political economy, 1, 95-113 [in Ukrainian].
- Lagutin, V. (2018). Mozhlyvosti instytucijnogo analizu suspil'noi' stabil'nosti ta rozvytku [Possibilities of institutional analysis of social stability and development]. Visnyk Kyi'vs'kogo torgovel'no-ekonomichnogo universytetu – Herald of the Kyiv University of Trade and Economics, 3 (119), 37-52 [in Ukrainian].
- Umanciv, Ju., & Minjajlo, O. (2018). Ekonomichna polityka derzhavy v umovah global'nyh transformacij – Economic policy of the state in the conditions of global transformations. Ekonomika Ukrai'ny – Ukraine economy, 9, 37-49 [in Ukrainian].
- Ayres, Robert U., C. J., Jeroen, M. van den Bergh, Lindenberger, Dietmar, & Warr, Benjamin (2013). The underestimated contribution of energy to economic growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 79-88. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.07.004 [in English].
- Fanning, A. L., & O'Neill, D. W. (2019). The Wellbeing-Consumption paradox: Happiness, health, income, and carbon emissions in growing versus non-growing economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 810-821 [in English].
- Malmaeus, J. Mikael, & Alfredsson, Eva C. (2017). Potential Consequences on the Economy of Low or No Growth – Short and Long Term Perspectives. Ecological Economics, 134, 57-64 [in English].
- Cosme, I., Santos, R., and O'Neill, D. W. Assessing the degrowth discourse: A review and analysis of academic degrowth policy proposals. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017, 149, 321-334 [in English].
- Weiss, Martin, & Cattaneo, Claudio (2017). Degrowth – Taking Stock and Reviewing an Emerging Academic Paradigm. Ecological Economics, 137, 220-230 [in English].
- Foxon, Timothy J. (2013). Responding to the financial crisis: Need for a new economics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 6, 126-128 [in English].
- Common, M., & Stagl, S. (2005). Ecological Economics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press [in English].
- Jackson, T., & Victor, P. (2012). Towards an Ecological Macroeconomics, INET Annual Plenary Conference: Paradigm Lost: rethinking economics and politics, Berlin, April. Retrieved from https://www.ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/victor-peter-berlin-paper-draft-w-Tim-Jackson.pdf [in English].
- Heikkinen, T. (2015). (De)growth and welfare in an equilibrium model with heterogeneous consumers. Ecological Economics, 116, August, 330-340 [in English].
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus & Giroux [in English].
- North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press [in English].
- Griethuysen, P. (2012). Bona diagnosis, bona curatio: How property economics clarifies the degrowth debate. Ecological Economics, 84, 262-269 [in English].
- Freeman, C., & Louca, F. (2001). As times goes by. From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Oxford University Press [in English].
- Zajcev, Ju., & Savchuk, V. (2009). Suchasna paradygma metodologii' doslidzhen' postindustrial'nogo suspil'stva [Modern paradigm of the methodology of post-industrial society research]. Vcheni zapysky – Scientific notes, 11, 3-13 [in Ukrainian].
- Lebedeva, L. V. (2014). Nova politychna ekonomija – teoretychna koncepcija doslidzhennja postindustrial'nogo suspil'stva. Formuvannja rynkovoi' ekonomiky [New political economy – the theoretical concept of the study of post-industrial society. Formation of a market economy]. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' – Collection of scientific works, 31, 306-314 [in Ukrainian].
- Lebedeva, L. V. (2013). Pro metodologiju doslidzhennja postindustrial'noi' ekonomiky [On the Methodology for the Study of Post-Industrial Economics]. Visnyk Kyi'vs'kogo torgovel'no-ekonomichnogo universytetu – Herald of the Kyiv University of Trade and Economics, (88), 28-39 [in Ukrainian].