Проводимо набір статей до публікації у науковому фаховому журналі
"Зовнішня торгівля: економіка, фінанси, право" з економічних та юридичних наук 


UDC 346.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2020(110)04
E-mail: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
ORCID: 0000-0002-0178-2003
Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of International Private, Commercial and Civil Law, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
19, Kyoto str., Kyiv, 02156, Ukraine


Background. Co-regulation requires adequate legislative support in Ukraine as a component of good governance in accordance with the provisions of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their member states, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, and in the direction of harmonization with EU law.
Analysis of recent research and publications. The theoretical aspects of co-regulation of economic activity in view of the European integration trend are not well understood. The aim is to define the concept of co-regulation of economic activity.
Materials and methods. The research used general scientific and special methods of knowledge of legal phenomena and processes, among them: dialectical, systematic approach, formal-logical, generalization, comparative law, synergistic. Information base of the research - Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their member states, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, the legislation of Ukraine, the EU Directive, the work of domestic and foreign scientists.
Results. The analysis of the content of regulations on co-regulation of economic activity indicates the fragmentation of ensuring the participation of SROs in regulating the industry. In most cases, such involvement only concerns the development of draft regulatory acts. An exception is the regulation of audit activity, which provides for the creation of a Public Audit Oversight Body. It is advisable to amend the Economic Code of Ukraine and to define co-regulation along with self-regulatory issues. Therefore, it is necessary to supplement Chapter 2-1 with the specified legal act «Basic principles of self-regulation and co-regulation in the sphere of economic activity. Self-regulatory organizations».
Conclusion. Co-regulation is an alternative or additional to the state regulation, definition and implementation of common and mutually agreed rules and means by public authorities, economic entities, self-regulatory organizations and consumers of goods and services for the purpose of streamlining economic activity in a particular field, industry, type (s). business and supervision and control. Co-regulation of economic activity should take a proper place in accordance with the role in the socio-economic life of the state. The development of civil society is a positive factor for its development. It is important to carry out analytical studies on the implementation of regulatory and organizational co-regulation in relevant areas, industries, types (types) of economic activity by establishing Co-regulatory Evaluation Criteria, which include: awareness of all stakeholders and understanding of the need; trust; the degree of preparedness of state bodies of local self-government, economic entities; benefits and risks; dispute settlement mechanism, etc.

Keywords: co-regulation of economic activity, economic activity, self-regulation, economic entities, public authorities.



  1. Bakalіnska, O. O. (2019). Samoregulyuvannya gospodarskoyidiyalnostiu suchasniy paradigmizmin. Pravove zabezpechennya sotsIalno-ekonomichnogo rozvitku: stan ta perspektivi: Materiali Vseukrayinskoyinaukovo-praktichnoyikonferentsiiyi(m. VInnitsya, 11-12 zhovtnya 2-19 r.) Nauk. red. A. G. Bobokova, A. M. Zaharchenko. Vinnitsya: TOV Vindruk [Self-regulation of economic activity in the modern paradigm of changes. The legal support of socio-economic development: state and prospects: Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian scientific-practical conference (Vinnytsia, October 11-12, 2-19). Scient. ed. A.G. Bobokova, A.M. Zakharchenko.  Vinnytsia: Windruk]. (pp. 50–53) [in Ukrainian].
  2. Belyanevich, O. A. (2016). Pitannya samoregulyuvannya gospodarskoyi diyalnosti. Ctabilnist tsivilnogo oborotu v Ukrayini: problemi zabezpechennya: zbirnik naukovih prats; za red. O. A. Belyanevich. K.: NDI privatnogo prava i pidpriemnitstva NAPrN Ukrayini [Issues of self-regulation of economic activity. The stability of civil turnover in Ukraine: problems of provision: collection of scientific works; ed. by O.A. Belianevych. Kyiv: Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine]. (Is. 4) [in Ukrainian].
  3. Vinnik, O. M. (2014). Zasobi samoregulyuvannya u vidnosinah derzhavno-privatnogo partnerstva [ Means of self-regulation in the relationships of the public-private partnership]. Pravo ta Innovatsyyi – Law and innovations, 1–2 (5–6), 12-20 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Börzel, T. A., Risse, T. (2015). Public-Private Partnerships: Effective and Legitimate Tools of International Governance? Prepared for the Edgar Grande/Louis W. Pauly (eds.), Complex Sovereignty: On the Reconstitution of Political Authority in the 21st Century 5. Retrieved from http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~atasp/texte/021015_ppp_risse_boerzel.pdf (date of application: 12.01.2019) [in German].
  5. Kleinsteuber, H. J. The Internet between Regulation and Governance. Self-regulation, Co-regulation, State Regulation.Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/fom/13844?download=true (date of application: 06/10/2019) [in English].
  6. Marsden, Ch. T. (n.d.). Co- and Self-regulation in European Media and Internet Sectors: The Results of Oxford University’s Study www.selfregulation.info Self-regulation, Co-regulation, State Regulation. osce.org.Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/fom/13844?download=true (date of application: 02/16/2019) [in English].
  7. Mazaraki, N. A. (2017). Zmist ta znachennya printsipu samoviznachennya storin mediatsiyi [The content and significance of the principle of self-determination of the parties of mediation].  Visnik Natsionalnogo tehnichnogo unIversitetu Ukrayini «KiYivskiy politehnichniy Institut» PolitologIya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo –Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute». Politology. Sociology. Law, 3-4, 94-97 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Mozhaykina, O.S. (2019). Zagalna harakteristika pravovidnosin v mediatsiyi [General characteristics of legal relations in mediation]. Naukoviy visnik Uzhgorodskogo natsionalnogo universitetu – Pravo – Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law, (Iss. 57), (pp. 75-77 [in Ukrainian]https://doi.org/10.32782/2307-3322.57-1.16.
  9. Grabosky, P., & Braithwaite, J. (1986). Of Manners Gentle: Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies, Oxford, Oxford University Press [in English].
  10. Yavorska, T. V. (2012). Samoregulyuvannya u strahovomu pidpriemnitstvi Ukrayini [Self-regulation in the insurance business of Ukraine]. Formuvannya rinkovih vIdnosin v Ukrayini – The formation of market relations in Ukraine, 2, 106-109 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Simpson, R., & Sinkova, O. M. (2004). Regulyuvannya poslug zagalnogo Interesu v ES. O.: ONyuA [Regulation of services of general interest in the EU. Odessa: ONyuA] [in Ukrainian].
  12. Goncharenko, O. (2017). Samoregulyuvannya ta spivregulyuvannya gospodarskoyi diyalnosti [ Self-regulation and co-regulation of economic activity].Pidpriemnitstvo, gospodarstvo i pravo– Entrepreneurship, economy and law,9, 62-66 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Bondarenko, E. P. (2011). Mehanіzm regulyuvannya rinku fіnansovih poslug Ukrayini: dis. …kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.08/ Derzhavniy vischiy navchalniy zaklad «Ukrayinska akademiya bankivskoyi spravi Natsionalnogo banku Ukrayini». Sumi [Mechanism of regulation of the financial services market of Ukraine: Candidate’s  thesis. 08.00.08/ State Higher Educational Institution «Ukrainian Academy of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine». Sumy], 236 s. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2004). Self-and Co-Regulation in the Mediamatics Sector: Transformation of Statehood and Political Strategies at the EU-Level.Knowledge, Technology & Policy,17 (2), 38-62 [in English]https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-004-1024-1.  
  15. European Self- and Сo-regulation. European Economic and Social Committee Single Market Observatory (SMO) (n.d.). eesc.europa.eu. Retrieved from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/auto_coregulation_en--2.pdf (датазвернення: 16.02.2018) [in English].
  16. Hoffmann-Riem, W. (2001). Modernisierung in Recht und Kultur. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp[in German].
  17. Goncharenko, O. M. (2019). Samoregulyuvannya gospodarskoyi diyalnosti: pitannya teoriyi ta praktiki: monografIya. Kyiv: NDI privatnogo prava i pidpriemnitstva imeni akademika F. G. Burchaka NAPrN Ukrayini [The self-regulation of economic activity: issues of theory and practice: monograph. Kyiv: Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship named after Academician F.G. Burchak of National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine.][in Ukrainian].
  18. Baldwin, R., & McCrudden, Ch. (1987). Regulation and public law:, eds. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. [in English].
  19. Latzer, M., Price, M. E., Saurwein, F., & Verhulst, S. G. (2007). Comparative Analysis of International Co- and Self-Regulation in Communications Markets URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2134877 (date of application: 10.06.2019) [in English].
  20. Palzer, С. (2002). Co-Regulation of the Media in Europe: European Provisions for the Establishment of Co-regulation Frameworks IRIS plus is a supplement to IRIS. Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Observatory. (Is. 6). Retrieved from  https://rm.coe.int/1680783387 (date of application: 16.02.2019) [in English].
  21. White Paper on European Governance, 25 July 2001, COM (2001) 428 final («White Paper»). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/communication-white-paper-governance-com2001428-20010725_en.pdf. (date of application: 16.02.2019) [in English].
  22. Final Report of the Mandelkern Group on Better Regulation, 13 November 2001 («Mandelkern Report»). Retrieved from  http://www.csl.gov.pt/docs/groupfinal.pdf (data zvernennja: 16.02.2019) [in English].
  23. Communication from the Commission – аction plan «Simplifying and improving the regulatory environment» COM/2002/0278. Retrieved from https:/eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52002DC0278 (data zvernennja: 12.01.2019)[in English].
  24. The Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their member states, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (2014). [Association Agreement between Ukraine, of the one part, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the other part, of 27 June 2014]Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011/stru#Stru(data zvernennja: 12.02.2019) [in Ukrainian].
  25. Pro audit fInansovoyi zvitnosti ta auditorsku diyalnist: Zakon Ukrayini vid 21 grudnya 2017 roku № 2258-VIII (2018). [On the audit of financial statements and auditing activities: Law of Ukraine of December 21, 2017 № 2258-VIII]. Vіdomosti Verhovnoyi Radi Ukrayini– Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine,9 [in Ukrainian].