Проводимо набір статей до публікації у науковому фаховому журналі
"Зовнішня торгівля: економіка, фінанси, право" з економічних та юридичних наук 

Cite as APA style citation
Babadzhanian H. Dogovir kupivli-prodazhu tovariv: zagal'ni obmezhennja samoreguljuvannja. Zovnishnja torgivlja: ekonomika, finansy, pravo. 2021. № 1. S. 54-62. Serija. Jurydychni nauky.

 FREE FULL TEXT (PDF)

UDC 346.5   DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2021(114)06
     
BABADZHANIAN Haiane

 
E-mail: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
ORCID: 0000-0002-6048-8787
  Applicantfor higher education of degree of Doctor of Philosophy and Assistant lecturer at the Department of International, Civil and Commercial Law, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
19, Kyoto str., Kyiv, 02156, Ukraine
     
 
CONTRACT OF PURCHASE AND SALE OF GOODS:
GENERAL RESTRICTIONS ON SELF-REGULATION
 
Background. The article considers the peculiarities of the restriction of the contract of sale of goods in the field of management. The treaty is a unique mechanism of private law, which gives its participants a wide freedom of action, gives the opportunity to act as a kind of "legislators" for themselves, but within the limits set by law.
Analysis of recent research and publications. The issue of self-regulation is the subject of discussion by many scholars and practitioners. The topic of improving the modern domestic system of normative self-regulation is being actively discussed in scientific circles. However, in the considered works the main attention is paid to self-regulation of the contract and contractual relations in general. Such a means of normative self-regulation as a contract of sale has not been given sufficient attention, which is the scientific novelty and relevance of the article.
The aim of this article is to determine the content of the restrictions of such a means of regulatory self-regulation as a contract of sale in the field of management.
Materials and methods. The information base of the article is the civil and economic legislation of Ukraine, the decisions of the Supreme Court, the works of domestic scientists. In the course of the research general scientific methods of cognition of legal phenomena and processes were used: dialectical, formal-logical, comparative, method of generalization.
Conclusion. Self-regulation of the economic contract is limited by the imperative norms defined in the legislation. The self-regulation of a commercial contract is most clearly manifested in the fact that the parties can independently determine the terms of the contract and at the same time set restrictions on it. It is concluded that the contract of sale of goods is a kind of economic contract, and therefore it has both general features of regulatory self-regulation, features of self-regulation of the economic contract and specific features of self-regulation, which are decisive only for the sale of goods.

Keywords: 
contract of sale, self-regulation, economic activity, normative self-regulation, contractual self-regulation, contractual obligation.

REFERENCES
  1. Fedik, S. Je., & Fedik, Je. I. (2019). Do pytannja zmistu umov normatyvnogo samoreguljuvannja [On the question of the content of the conditions of normative self-regulation]. Visnyk L’vivs’kogo torgovel’no-ekonomichnogo universytetu – Bulletin of Lviv University of Trade and Economics,8, 210-216 [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.36477/2616-7611-2019-08-23.
  2. Goncharenko, O. M. (2019). Samoregulyuvannya gospodars’koi’ diyal’nosti: pitannya teorii’ ta praktiki [Self-regulation of economic activity: questions of theory and practice]. Kyi’v: NDI privatnogo prava i pidprijemnictva imeni akademika F. G. Burchaka NAPrN Ukrai’ni [in Ukrainian].
  3. Gogolinab, G. V. (2017). Misce elektronnogo dogovoru kupivli-prodazhu v systemi torgivli. [The place of the electronic contract of purchase-sale in the trading system]. Chasopys Kyi’vs’kogo universytetu prava – Journal of Kyiv University of Law, 3, 158-161 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Vavzhenchuk, S. Ya. (2010). Dogovir kupivli-prodazhu: klasychna doktryna ta problemy ukrai’ns’kogo cyvil’nogo prava [Purchase-sale agreement: classical doctrine and problems of Ukrainian civil law]. Jurydychnyj visnyk – Legal Bulletin, 4, 73-76 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Cyvil’nyj kodeks Ukrai’ny: Zakon Ukrai’ny vid 16 sichnja 2003 roku № 435-IV [Civil Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of January 16, 2003 № 435-IV]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15. (data zvernennya: 07.11.2020) [in Ukrainian].
  6. Gospodars’kyj kodeks Ukrai’ny: Zakon Ukrai’ny vid 16 sichnja 2003 roku № 436-IV [Commercial Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of January 16, 2003 № 436-IV]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15. (data zvernennya: 07.11.2020) [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880786.
  7. Nemchenko, S. S. (2014). Pryncyp svobody dogovoru: golovnyj pryncyp dogovirnyh vidnosyn u cyvil’nomu pravi [Nemchenko S.S. The principle of freedom of contract: the main principle of contractual relations in civil law]. Pivdennoukrai’ns’kyj pravnychyj chasopys – South Ukrainian Law Journal, 3, 101-103 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Galun’ko, V., & Gryshhenko, L. (et al). (2020). Naukovo-praktychnyj komentar (Gospodars’kyj kodeks Ukrai’ny) Scientific and practical commentary (Commercial Code of Ukraine). Kyi’v [in Ukrainian].
  9. Postanova Verhovnogo Sudu u skladi kolegii’ suddiv Drugoi’ sudovoi’ palati Kasacijnogo civil’nogo sudu vid 30 veresnya 2020 roku, sprava №559/1605/18. Jedinij rejestr sudovih rishen’ Resolution of the Supreme Court in the composition of the panel of judges of the Second Judicial Chamber of the Civil Court of Cassation of September 30, 2020, case № 559/1605/18. Unified register of court decisions Retrieved from http://od.reyestr.court.gov.ua/files/46/ec324b17ab158c44129dfe4af63b8c5e.rtf (data zvernennya: 05.11.2020) [in Ukrainian].
  10. Milash, V. S. (2014). Perspektivi modernizacii’ dogovirnih pravovidnosin u sferi gospodaryuvannya Prospects for modernization of contractual relations in the field of management. Harkiv: Harkivs’kij nacional’nij universitet mis’kogo gospodarstva im. O. M. Beketova [in Ukrainian].
  11. Pogribnij, S. O. (2010). Imperativni ta dispozitivni normi ta i’h rol’ v regulyuvanni civil’nih vidnosin. [Imperative and dispositive norms and its role in the regulation of civil relations]. Universitets’ki naukovi zapiski – University scientific notes, 2, 46-52 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Belyanevich, O. A. (2006). Gospodars’ke dogovirne pravo Ukrai’ni (teoretichni aspekti) Commercial contract law of Ukraine (theoretical aspects). YUrinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].
  13. Vasil’ev, V. V. (2018). Dyspozytyvnist’ norm cyvil’nogo prava z tochky zoru formal’no-dogmatychnogo pidhodu. [Dispositiveness of civil law norms from the pointof view of formal-dogmatic approach]. Pidpryjemnyctvo gospodarstvo i pravo –Entrepreneurship economy and law, 12, (10-14) [in Ukrainian].
  14. Patinka, Yu. O. (2016). Pravovi problemy ukladannja dogovoru kupivli-prodazhu z vykorystannjam merezhi internet. [Legal problems of concluding a contract of purchase-sale using the Internet]. Aktual’ni problemy vitchyznjanoi’ jurysprudencii’ – Actual problems of domestic jurisprudence, 3, (53-56) [in Ukrainian].
  15. Baranov, O. A. (2012). Pravovi problemy elektronnoi’ torgivli. [Legal issues of e-commerce]. Informacija i pravo – Information and law, 2, 48-56 [in Ukrainian].